Does it seem strange (ironic? unlucky? typical?) that, within days of the federal government reaffirming its support for a Via Rail high-speed rail corridor in Ontario and Quebec, the passenger railway was hit with new regulations by CN? The new rules were brought in due to fears that its new Siemens Venture trains run the risk of not activating CN's grade crossing guards and signals. I won't get into the finer details of this new wrinkle for Via. Eric Gagnon of Trackside Treasure broke the story and did an excellent job of describing the problem. Check out his post on this issue here.
As Eric points out, Via does not have a lot of great choices in the short term, as its Ventures alone run the risk of not activating signals at grade crossings (this is an oversimplification). The choices the railway faced were bad no matter what, so Via decided in the interim to slow its speed in the corridor to allow for these new trains to cross all grade crossings safely by properly activating the crossing guards and signals.
It should be pointed out, and Eric did of course, that Via's legacy equipment, like its LRC and HEP cars, led by F40s and P42s, are not affected by this new rule. They have no operational issues with CN grade crossing equipment.
The reduction in Venture speed, however, means delays across the corridor, since Via Rail depends on its tenancy on CN rails for much of its routes. In the Ottawa area, Via enjoys much greater autonomy as it controls its schedule on the Smiths Falls and Brockville Subs between Ottawa and Brockville, via Smiths Falls. Also, Via largely runs unopposed most of the time on the Alexandria Sub from Ottawa into Quebec. In Southern Ontario, Via has more leeway between Chatham and Windsor as well as on the old Goderich Exeter Railway between London and Guelph, since CN does not use its Guelph Subdivision with the same regularity as it does its busier routes.
For much of its operations in Quebec and Ontario, however, Via Rail depends on CN rails, many of which are its main routes.
Last week, I witnessed some of these challenges in real life as I was waiting to catch westbound Via Train 59, which usually passes through Nepean at 6 p.m. Instead, I saw an eastbound corridor train, Via Train 42, coming through the Merivale Road crossing nearly an hour late at a time when the westbound 59 usually has the all clear signal all the way to Fallowfield Station. The light was getting pretty dim, so I didn't stick around for Train 59, which might have been holding at the siding at Wass, closer to the Tremblay Road station in Riverside Park.
Speaking of Wass, I noticed when I caught Train 59 in September on Hunt Club Road that Via has erected a sign on the right hand side of the track alerting crews that the Wass siding is ahead, although not before the train passes through Federal Junction, taking it onto the Beachburg Sub.
Here's a shot from 2016 of a westbound Via Rail LRC consist overtaking a slower moving CN freight train on the Kingston Sub near Highway 401 through Kingston. Via Rail has always had to make do with its status among CN's freight traffic on this trackage. There was a time when a few of its long distance trains could make use of CN's Northern Transcontinental route through Algonquin Park and onto the Beachburg Sub through the Upper Ottawa Valley, but those days are long gone. With everything heavily concentrated on this right-of-way, Via Rail is at the mercy of CN, which has had an impact on its on-time performance since its very founding.
So, in theory, re-establishing a route from Ottawa through Tweed, Marmora and Havelock sounds great, as this right-of-way still exists up to Havelock, and much of the path to the east would be salvageable, albeit at a cost. This line once connected Toronto and Ottawa via Peterborough, but has long since been severed and exists now as the more leisurely moving Kawartha Lakes Railway into Havelock and north into Nephton. This line has been the subject of political interest for more than a decade.
You might recall efforts to re-establish rail service between Peterborough and Toronto during the Stephen Harper years in power. First, there was talk of Via RDC service. At some point, the talk shifted to the possibility of a GO Train link, not unlike what you see in Kitchener today. But nothing has come of it.
Given the complexity and cost of a high-speed rail line along the Kawartha Lakes Railway route and the former CP trackage to the east, I would put the chances of this happening as very low, especially given the fact that we are likely headed for a change in government in the coming year. The arguably profligate spenders at the wheel now will likely give way to a government of restraint, as is the normal case in this country. We tend to go back and forth and it seems the pendulum is swinging back toward fiscal conservatism.
So where does this week's headache leave Via? To me, it seems it leaves the railway pretty much where it's always been, which is in limbo. Try as its leadership might, it's an operation that just cannot seem to catch a break and it just can't seem to be able to realize its dreams. I'm trying to be fair here, but I would be remiss if I didn't mention some of the railway's missteps along the way, and there have been a few. But that is for another time.
Finally, it seems as though much of the world is embracing rail as the greenest, most efficient mode of transportation. So, you would think we could make it work in a country like ours. But it seems as though Via is now at a point where it's all dressed up with new equipment, but the same problems it's always had continue to haunt it.
So you'll more than likely be late if you are taking the train in the corridor these days, but at least you'll look good getting there.
4 comments:
Only in Canada! ….. These issues should have been daylighted at resolved before the first revenue Charger/Venture trainsets hit the rails. What makes CN so different/special from Amtrak’s host railroads, and Florida East Coast with Brightline. ….. If VIA were smart, they’d pay some big bucks to lure some management from Brightline and put their house in order.
That was my reaction too, Kevin, when I read Eric Gagnon's breakdown of the situation on his blog. How could Via have planned this rollout of new equipment and no one on their side, or on CN's for that matter, have addressed this potential issue? As you say, there likely would have been ample data from Brightline in Florida and Amtrak's use of Siemens equipment. Why is it only CN's technology that seems to be susceptible to this issue?
Thanks for the link and also for your fair description of VIA's challenges, ending on a positive note in your post. The biggest challenge VIA seems to face when problems assail is the poor communication and transparency with taxpayers and passengers alike. Instead, known problems are hidden.
Nothing jumps out at me from VIA's webpage as I do a ghost-booking of a Venture train that we KNOW is going to arrive late. Nothing to warn me. Nothing to suggest I try a Legacy-equipped train instead. That's disingenuous and misleading on VIA's part.
Last night's debacle at Brockville was a replay of the Quebec 622 debacle which was a replay of the Cobourg Christmas debacle. All this gets VIA hauled in front of the Commons Transport Committee, as you'll read in an imminent Trackside Treasure post.
HSR becomes HFR. You know, High Fantasy Rail!
Thanks for sharing, Michael.
Eric
I just found the proximity of the HSR announcement and the latest flub quite ridiculous, Eric. It's the classic case of the right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing. And the communications strategy, as you mention, is not transparent at all.
Post a Comment